With Facebook planning to go public next month, its S-1 registration statement is worth perusing for details about its stock plans and some of the tax issues the company and its employees face (other than the obvious fact that they will be very rich and can thus afford the best tax and financial advisors!).
Below are a few of the tidbits that can be gleaned from the SEC filing to go public.
Switch To RSUs; Tax Bill Due
Facebook initially granted stock options to employees during its early days but switched almost entirely to restricted stock units in 2007. RSUs granted by Facebook before January 1, 2011, vest after two conditions: a specified length of employment at the company plus a liquidity event such as an IPO (see page 48). Grants made after that date do not have this liquidity condition, as they vest over four or five years (see page 60). We have been seeing this two-part vesting grant structure at other large pre-IPO companies.
Vesting will occur six months after Facebook's IPO. At that time, employees will owe taxes on the income from these pre-IPO RSUs at ordinary income rates. (In comparison, employees who had stock options before the move to RSUs will see most of the stock's appreciation taxed at capital gains rates, assuming they exercised them more than one year ago.) The company expects that many of its employees with RSUs will see 45% of the value of their shares withheld for taxes (see page 56).
Facebook intends to net-settle the shares at vesting, instead of leaving employees to sell shares for the taxes they owe. To come up with the cash needed to meet its withholding obligations and remit the funds to the IRS, the company plans to sell stock near the settlement date in an amount that is roughly equivalent to the number of shares of common stock that it withholds for taxes (see page 21).
Stock Option Grant Held By Mark Zuckerberg
In 2005 Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO and founder of Facebook, received nonqualified stock options to acquire 120 million shares of Facebook class B (voting) stock (see page 113). These have all vested, and the option term is scheduled to expire on November 7, 2015. With the exercise price of 6 cents per share and Facebook's valuation of over $100 billion, he will owe a giant amount of taxes at exercise. Some of the tax issues he faces are covered in The Federal Taxation Developments Blog.
Company's Tax Deduction & Earnings Charge
The company's tax deduction for the income realized by employees, from both RSU vesting and NQSO exercise, could generate a tax refund of up to $500 million in the first six months of 2013 (see page 63). This attracted attention when Senator Carl Levin again proposed his bill to limit the corporate tax deduction for stock compensation. According to an article on this in The Washington Post, some analysts calculate that the tax savings from stock compensation at Facebook could be much higher than the figures mentioned in the company's registration statement. (Estimates run up to $7.5 billion in deductions, translating into $3 billion in federal and state tax savings.)
According to Amendment 4 of Facebook's S-1 registration statement, as of March 31, 2012, Facebook had $2.381 billion in unrecognized stock compensation expenses on its income statement, with $2.319 billion for RSUs and $62 million for restricted stock and options (see page 53 of Amendment 4). For pre-2011 RSUs that met the first vesting trigger of a service condition on or before March 31, 2012, Facebook will recognize a $965 million expense when it goes public at the start of the IPO (see page 53), though net of income taxes this amount will be $640 million (see page 37 in Amendment 4).
Would Stock Options Have Been Better?
The move to granting restricted stock units instead of stock options may have been better for the company for many reasons, including the prospect of minimizing share dilution, along with the relief of having fewer post-IPO multi-millionaire employees to retain and motivate (well, fewer with gains of $10–$100 million, anyway). Depending on the size of the RSU grants relative to previously made stock options grants at Facebook, a basic calculation shows that, given the stock-price appreciation, employees with RSUs would be sitting on much larger gains if they had received stock options.
Example: Regardless of whether employees exercise options earlier or later after the IPO, the following example shows the potential magnitude of their gains from receiving stock options instead of restricted stock (pre- and post-tax calculations are easy to do with the tools on myStockOptions.com). For this example, let's use the exercise price of 6 cents for the options Mr. Zuckerberg received in 2005 (other employees would have received grants at same price at that time, assuming these were not discounted stock options). Let's assume Facebook granted four times as many stock options as RSUs (the actual ratio may have been much greater). With the current value of Facebook stock at $30.89 (see page 77 of Amendment 4), the following shows the pre-tax gains:
Current gains/spread for grant of 400,000 stock options made in 2005 ($0.06 exercise price): $12.332 million (400,000 x [$30.89 – $0.06])
Grant of 100,000 RSUs: $3.089 million
The blog Inside Facebook also wonders whether Facebook employees would have been better off with options, at least from a tax perspective. While employees would have had the opportunity to exercise shares earlier, when the spread was small, and to start the capital gains holding period sooner, they would also have had to come up with cash to hold the stock while risking the possibility that a liquidity event did not occur.
Given the big tax bills that employees at Facebook will incur, along with the much larger upside they would have realized if they had received stock options instead of RSUs, we wonder whether other pre-IPO companies will rethink whether to grant stock options again. Some private companies use a special type of stock option grant that allows immediate exercise, after which the stock received is subject to vesting. One reason for granting this type of option is to let employees start the capital gains holding period earlier and to allow them to decide when they want to pay the taxes (i.e. early if the options are granted with little or no spread, or later if employees are certain the stock will eventually have real value).
[For more on Facebook stock compensation, see our blog entry of October 29 about the end of the lockup.]
Comments